No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Alerts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST
No Result
View All Result
Benefits Expert
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • PROFILE
  • PENSIONS
  • GLOBAL REWARDS
  • FINANCIAL BENEFITS
  • HEALTH & WELLBEING
  • DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
  • PODCAST

Goldman Sachs employee wins paternity discrimination tribunal 

by Benefits Expert
06/12/2024
Father and new baby, paternity leave, parental leave
Share on LinkedInShare on Twitter

An employment tribunal has ruled that a Goldman Sachs employee was unfairly dismissed after taking six months of paternity leave and was subjected to direct sex discrimination.

Jon Reeves, vice president of the compliance department in London, had told senior colleagues at the financial firm that he was struggling to manage his work-life balance when he returned from paternity leave in 2022.

He was later dismissed on performance grounds. However, Reeves said that performance concerns were not raised with him until he was on parental leave, and his appraisals showed he was “fully meeting expectations”. 

In an earlier call when Reeves raised concerns about work life balance, he was told “you’re a grown man, you can sort this out” during a call with Omar Beer, the firm’s global co-head of the investment banking division (IBD) compliance, and Tin Hsien Tan, managing director, global co-head of IBD compliance and Asia Pacific head of compliance. 

The tribunal found that Beer was dismissive of Reeves concerns, as a man, about balancing childcare with work during covid lockdown. 

The tribunal also found that the employer subjected the claimant to direct sex discrimination, including allegations of underperformance, reducing his pay, and ultimately dismissing him.

However, the tribunal also said that there was a 50 percent likelihood that Goldman Sachs would have conducted a fair dismissal based on non-discriminatory reasons (IE by making him redundant), if a fair process had been followed. This finding is likely to influence any compensation awarded.

Tribunal judges explained their decision pointing to claims that the employer had treated him less favourably compared to a hypothetical female employee under similar circumstances, particularly regarding performance reviews, redundancy processes, and dismissal.

They also determined that the employer’s actions constituted less favourable treatment due to the claimant’s sex, which breaches the Equality Act 2010.

RELATED POSTS

Pension access for homebuying could help some employees, but risks unforeseen consequences – Nest Insight research

Pension access for homebuying could help some employees, but risks unforeseen consequences – Nest Insight research

Workplace pension provider Aegon up for sale

Goldman Sachs has an ‘equal employment opportunity’ policy, which applies in the UK. Under this policy managers are evaluated in part on the basis of their success in carrying out our equal employment opportunity policies. They are also evaluated on achieving more diverse teams. In a bid to increase female representation in all its worldwide workforces the employer introduced a firm-wide paid leave policy from 8 April 2020. This allows all employees to take up to 26 weeks of paid leave within 12 months of the birth or legal adoption of their child. Goldman Sachs emphasised that its parental leave policy significantly exceeds its legal obligations.

Next Post
older workers

Winter financial wellbeing campaign signs up 100 major employers

rewards

SMEs revamp pension, health and lifestyle perks to attract candidates

BENEFITS UNBOXED PODCAST

HR & Benefits Unboxed
HR & Benefits Unboxed

The podcast from HR & Benefits, the title for HR, reward and benefits professionals.

Seasoned professionals examine the challenges and innovations in today’s employee benefits, reward and HR sector. Every episode, they will unbox a key issue and unpack what it really means for employers and how they can tackle it.

National Minimum Pay: Caravan ahead of the car?
byDefinite Article Media

In this episode we take an in-depth look at the rise of costs and challenges associated with the National Living and National Minimum Wage.

Steve Herbert is joined by Tim Kellett of pay and benefits benchmarking experts Paydata and Ian Hodson, Director of People & Culture at employer Housing21.  

National Minimum Pay: Caravan ahead of the car?
National Minimum Pay: Caravan ahead of the car?
16/02/2026
Definite Article Media
Search Results placeholder

GUIDE TO CASH PLANS



REQUEST A FREE COPY

OPINION

Alex Elliott, Birketts, employment law

Alex Elliott: New limits on NDAs, what’s ahead for employers?

Luke McClaran, chief people officer, Vitality

Luke McClaran: prevention pays, why employer health checks matter

Duncan Brown, principal associate, Institute for Employment Studies, pay. reward, work

From ‘boat people’ to boardrooms: HR can help reshape migration mindsets

Neil Mullarkey, communications, expert, author, improv

Why marketing will define tomorrow’s reward leaders

SUBSCRIBE

Benefits Expert

© 2024 Definite Article Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact

Follow Benefits Expert

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • In depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
  • Global rewards
  • Financial benefits
  • Health & wellbeing
  • Diversity & Inclusion